nanog mailing list archives
Re: MACsec SFP
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:21:27 -0400
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
Solution could be same as for tunable optics, first you tune with eeprommer until CLI gets support. Remote legs could have their own eeprommer, which can be easy enough to use not to require training and costs like 10EUR.it's going to be hard to schedule a key roll then, right?i have always been fond of rfc 4808 and not the unnecessarily complex alternatives such as tcp-ao.
sure... but to do this you have to be able to program the keys from the platform the SFP is plugged into.. .not via the sfp itself (outside the chassis)
Current thread:
- Re: MACsec SFP, (continued)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Aris Lambrianidis (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP John Schiel (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- RE: MACsec SFP Michael O Holstein (Jun 25)