Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP

[Arturo Servin <arturo.servin () gmail com>]

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>wrote:

> Is there some technical reason that BGP is not an option? You could allow
> them to announce their AT&T space via you as a secondary.


unless it is a /26, /25 or something shorter.

Even with a /24 things may get messy.

IPv4 is coming to an end, but it is not possible for the customer to get
their own space and use BGP?

Regards,
as