nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:48:33 -0600 (CST)
Depending on their business=2C using dynamic DNS providers could be a reall= y bad idea. If they deal only with home users who won't even know=2C it'll = probably work. If their customers are security-aware businesses=2C they pro= bably block all sites hosted with dynamic DNS systems.
Where do dynamic DNS /providers/ enter the picture? You update *your own* DNS records. Those could conceivably be hosted with a dynamic DNS provider, but why not just use the API for whatever system you currently use for DNS? ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
Current thread:
- ISP inbound failover without BGP Eric A Louie (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Joe Greco (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Matthew Crocker (Mar 03)
- RE: ISP inbound failover without BGP Ray (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Eric A Louie (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Joe Greco (Mar 03)
- RE: ISP inbound failover without BGP Ray (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Randy Carpenter (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Arturo Servin (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Eric A Louie (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Faisal Imtiaz (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Justin M. Streiner (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Jon Lewis (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Seth Mattinen (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Vlade Ristevski (Mar 04)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP Sebastian Spies (Mar 04)