nanog mailing list archives

Re: arin representation


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:04:09 +0900

I do not agree with the characterization that "... we are ruled by
self-perptuating monopolies which lack oversight and accountability",

when you have a governance committee which is composed of the governing,
not outsiders and governance experts, with no term limits, it would seem
hard to support that argument.

- Simple terms and conditions for contracts with registries
- Membership organizations for registries with term limits 
  for Board and advisory bodies
- Board diversity (meaning real world users)
- Competitive registries 
- ...

i pretty much agree that arin should do these.  except ...

iff we could get reasonable governance, i am not sure we need multiple
rirs.  after all, the registries were just supposed to be bookkeepers.
but i agree that competition is a good method of injecting some reality
into the physics in the absense of other means.

but i eagerly await the simplification of arin's ts&cs.  and get rid of
being able to change them unilateraly and arbitrarily, and get rid the
silly game about legacy rights, and a whole bunch of us might join.

randy


Current thread: