Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.

[Alex Lesser <alex () pssclabs com>]

www.pssclabs.com

> On May 7, 2014, at 6:47 PM, "Shawn L" <shawnl () up net> wrote:
>
> Do the ASR1k routers have this issue as well?  I searched around but
> couldn't find any information.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Irwin, Kevin <Kevin.Irwin () cinbell com>
> Date: Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for
> 6500/7600 routers.
> To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
>
>
> I¹m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already,
> especially on the 9K¹s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it
> comes to the 512K limit.
>
> Also make sure you have spare cards when you reload after changing the
> scaling, those old cards don¹t always like to come back.
>
> > On 5/6/14, 7:01 PM, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:
> >
> > > On 5/6/2014 10:39 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > >
> > > Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community
> > > talks about for the next decade.
> >
> > Like we have for the last two?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Requiescas in pace o email           Two identifying characteristics
> >                                        of System Administrators:
> > Ex turpi causa non oritur actio      Infallibility, and the ability to
> >                                        learn from their mistakes.
> >                                          (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive
> this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this
> document.