nanog mailing list archives
Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
From: "Irwin, Kevin" <Kevin.Irwin () cinbell com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:45:09 +0000
It depends, you can put in a table-map to stop the routes from being installed into the FIB/RIB on an ASR-1K with 2GB of RAM you can then have up to 2 million IPv4 routes. Alternatively, if you are not using your ASR-1k to forward traffic, I think you could also just turn off CEF and have the same result. On 5/8/14, 2:15 AM, "Nikolay Shopik" <shopik () inblock ru> wrote:
Asr1002-f may have problem as it limited to 512k iircOn 08 мая 2014 г., at 2:45, Shawn L <shawnl () up net> wrote: Do the ASR1k routers have this issue as well? I searched around but couldn't find any information. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Irwin, Kevin <Kevin.Irwin () cinbell com> Date: Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:39 AM Subject: Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org> I¹m really surprised that most people have not hit this limit already, especially on the 9K¹s, as it seems Cisco has some fuzzy math when it comes to the 512K limit. Also make sure you have spare cards when you reload after changing the scaling, those old cards don¹t always like to come back.On 5/6/14, 7:01 PM, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:On 5/6/2014 10:39 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community talks about for the next decade.Like we have for the last two? -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document.
Current thread:
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers., (continued)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. chiel (May 08)
- RE:Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Darin (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Larry Sheldon (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 07)
- Fwd: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Shawn L (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Alex Lesser (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Pete Lumbis (May 07)
- RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Tony Wicks (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nikolay Shopik (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nikolay Shopik (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Michael Dikkema (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Pete Lumbis (May 12)
- RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Vitkovský Adam (May 09)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Dobbins, Roland (May 09)