nanog mailing list archives

Re: New Zealand Spy Agency To Vet Network Builds, Provider Staff


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 06:34:51 -0700

While I applaud NZ being open and honest about it, I do think that they have gone quite a bit further than the NSA and 
that their proposal is far more damaging.

Owen

On May 13, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:

Exactly. They just broke in and left a trail of open doors behind.

Again, not saying either is good, just saying at least NZ is being "above board".

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

On May 13, 2014, at 14:01 , Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

I didn’t see the NSA telling us what we had to buy are demanding advance approval rights on our maintenance 
procedures.

Owen

On May 13, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> wrote:

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of this. But at least they did it in the open, unlike the NSA (where you live).

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

On May 13, 2014, at 12:12 , Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

Yep… If I had infrastructure in NZ, that would be enough to cause me to remove it.

Owen

On May 13, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I realize that New Zealand is *not* in North America (hence NANOG),
but I figure that some global providers might be interested here.

This sounds rather... dire (probably not the right word).

"The new Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Act
of 2013 is in effect in New Zealand and brings in several drastic
changes for ISPs, telcos and service providers. One of the country's
spy agencies, the GCSB, gets to decide on network equipment
procurement and design decisions (PDF), plus operators have to
register with the police and obtain security clearance for some staff.
Somewhat illogically, the NZ government pushed through the law
combining mandated communications interception capabilities for law
enforcement, with undefined network security requirements as decided
by the GCSB. All network operators are subject to the new law,
including local providers as well as the likes of Facebook, Google,
Microsoft, who have opposed it, saying the new statutes clash with
overseas privacy legislation."

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/05/13/005259/new-zealand-spy-agency-to-vet-network-builds-provider-staff

FYI,

- - ferg



- -- 
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlNyHw4ACgkQKJasdVTchbLwDgD/WVHo2iTapJ90l8MRcwUZ5OQ7
QfJ5cI1v4t2bUXZp1hQBAKHCP0hyxg6naGOzRLt/vHjgxXnl3+yiWoj0ENxQyIr9
=0yLu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: