nanog mailing list archives
RE: NAT IP and Google
From: "Tony Wicks" <tony () wicks co nz>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200
On May 20, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Pui Edylie <email () edylie net> wrote: The absolute best solution is to deploy IPv6 and deprecate NAT. If you're
looking for an IPv4-only solution, I don't have a good answer for you. Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every home user has... really ? come on, back in the real world that is just not going to happen until by default every CPE device has the capability as default. Dual stack with CGNAT is the only real solution that works today.
Current thread:
- NAT IP and Google Pui Edylie (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Owen DeLong (May 21)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 21)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Livingood, Jason (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Sholes, Joshua (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) manning (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Michael Brown (May 22)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)