nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT IP and Google
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:17:57 -0700
On May 21, 2014 4:17 PM, "Ca By" <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
On May 21, 2014 4:04 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200, "Tony Wicks" said:Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every
home
user has... really ? come on, back in the real world that is just not
going
to happen until by default every CPE device has the capability as
default.
Dual stack with CGNAT is the only real solution that works today.And if 5 years ago you had *started* distributing CPE that did v6, and
by now
you had 40% of your customer with CPE that did it, you'd need a 40%
smaller CGN
to fix your Google problem..Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetration, T-Mobile US and Comcast are
closing in on 30%
It's a non-trivial number of eyeballs. And, FB, Google / Youtube , and
Netflix are all native ipv6 ...its a lot of cotent too.
CB
Citation http://www.worldipv6launch.org/verizon-wireless-breaks-through-50-ipv6-and-still-climbing/
Current thread:
- NAT IP and Google Pui Edylie (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Owen DeLong (May 21)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 21)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Livingood, Jason (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Sholes, Joshua (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) manning (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Michael Brown (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Julien Goodwin (May 22)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)