nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
From: Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:49:14 -0400
On 5/22/14 8:04 AM, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com> wrote:
On 5/21/14, 9:38 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared () puck nether net> wrote:On May 21, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:Verizon Wireless is at 50% ipv6 penetrationI suspect this would go up significantly if Twitter and Instagram would IPv6 enable their services. Same for pintarest.+1 We naturally focus a lot on network enablement here, but IMO it is a great time to focus on more web-based services embracing IPv6 with another June 6 just around the corner. :-)
A side project I've been meaning to take on: In his really useful listing of content providers' IPv6 support, https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/ Eric Vyncke has added "CDN" to sites using an identifiable CDN. I've been meaning to write a script to pull those sites and CDNs, to identify "bang for the buck" in CDN enablement. I know Akamai is enormous, but if CloudFlare, Limelight, and a couple of hosting companies were to dual-stack all of their customers, would it matter that Akamai and Amazon weren't doing so yet? Or another way to look at it would be, who would be the key players for a major content enablement day? Lee
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Michael Brown (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Julien Goodwin (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Geoff Huston (May 23)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Rubens Kuhl (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Lee Howard (May 23)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Lee Howard (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Matthew Petach (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Ryan Rawdon (May 28)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Matthew Petach (May 28)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 21)
- Message not available
- Re: NAT IP and Google Larry Sheldon (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Derek Andrew (May 22)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Royce Williams (May 22)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Chris Adams (May 22)