Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)

[Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net>]

On 23 May 2014, at 3:29 pm, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Julien Goodwin <nanog () studio442 com au> wrote:
> > On 23/05/14 11:21, Jared Mauch wrote:
> > > You can't cater to everyones broken network.  I can't reach 1.1.1.1 from here either, but sometimes when I travel I 
> > > can, even with TTL=1.  At some point folks have to fix what's broken.
> >
> > 1.1.1.1 is not private IP space.
> >
> > BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24
> > Paths: (2 available, best #1)
> >  15169
> >  AS-path translation: { Google }
> >    edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
> >      Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal, best
> >      Community: Europe  Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
> >      Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
> >  15169
> >  AS-path translation: { Google }
> >    edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
> >      Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal
> >      Community: Europe  Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
> >      Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
> >
> > (Yes ok, it doesn't respond to any packets last I checked)
>
> <cough>some times it does</cough>
> (some portion of the space does/service replies to a sample of packets...)
>
> Geoff should have more info on the progress of his experiment though.


Some time back I did try responding to TCP SYNs with SYN ACKs, to see where it went. But
it massively increased load and I gave up. So if 1.1.1.1 responds to you.... its NOT me!

  Geoff