nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large DDoS, small extortion
From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell () isipp com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 10:29:14 -0600
Law enforcement and victims have different objectives. Law enforcement wants to find the criminal, gather sufficient evidence to prove their guilt, then prosecute them. More attacks helps law enforcement. The victims, in general, want the attacks to stop.
Actually, our experience in this particular case (it is the same person(s) hitting all of the targets, even using the same email addresses, etc.) is that the victims want to find the guy too. In fact, I can say with a fair degree of certainty that the coordinated efforts of a dedicated group of "victims", who have come together without regards to the fact that they are otherwise 'competitors' in business, and who have furnished the agencies with useable technical information about the attacks, have given the agencies a substantial leg up in the investigation. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Author: Section 6 of the Federal CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose
Current thread:
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion, (continued)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Andrew Sullivan (May 23)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Barry Shein (May 24)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Brett Frankenberger (May 23)
- Message not available
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Larry Sheldon (May 23)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Matthew Petach (May 23)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Merike Kaeo (May 23)
- Re: Large DDoS, small extortion Merike Kaeo (May 23)