nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () massar ch>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:26:38 +0100
On 2014-11-10 15:20, Joe Greco wrote:
Hey, VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario. Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to certain restraints, we have to go down this route.Without explaining the "restraints," this kinda boils down to "'cuz we want it," which stopped being good justification many years ago. I doubt you'll find many takers who would want to provide you with a circuit for a few Mbps with a /23 for OOB purposes "'just cuz."
"just cuz" ack'ing packets for the spam we are sending will be possible then. Is likely what goes through most people's minds... Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions, (continued)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Justin M. Streiner (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions ryanL (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Doug Barton (Nov 12)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Joe Greco (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Jeroen Massar (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Ruairi Carroll (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Brett Frankenberger (Nov 10)