Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

[joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>]

On 10/12/14 3:00 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net> wrote:
> > A follow up question on this topic..
> >
> > For Router Loopback Address .... what is wisdom in allocating a /64 vs /128 ?
> > (the BCOP document suggests this, but does not offer any explanation or merits of one over the other).
>
> Hi Faisal,
>
> One of the viewpoints held by some in the IETF is that an IPv6 address
> is not 128 bits. Rather, it is 64 bits of network space and 64 bits of
> host space. I'm told this viewpoint is responsible for the existence
> of a 128 bit address instead of IPv6 using 64 bit addresses.
>
> If you follow that reasoning, the subnet mask should always be /64, no
> matter where the address is assigned.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164

Is a standards track document.

it is imho a repudiation of the assumptions about the dimensions of the
host field.

> There are, of course, excellent operational reasons not to religiously
> follow that plan.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature