nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Next Big Thing: Named-Data Networking


From: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch () fu-berlin de>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:42:43 +0200


On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Sander Steffann wrote:

Well, you don't need addresses for clients, just for content... From 
the architecture page at http://named-data.net/project/archoverview/:

"Note that neither Interest nor Data packets carry any host or 
interface addresses (such as IP addresses); Interest packets are 
routed towards data producers based on the names carried in the 
Interest packets, and Data packets are returned based on the state 
information set up by the Interests at each router hop."

So it's basically suggesting a NAT-like table in every single router.
And we all know how well NAT boxes scale...

  the pending interest table is more similar to multicast routing table,
which is maintained by end user subscriptions -- still challenging wrt
to scalability.


Cheers
  matthias

-- 
Matthias Waehlisch
.  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
.  Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:waehlisch () ieee org .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net


Current thread: