nanog mailing list archives

Re: Small IX IP Blocks


From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 19:36:17 -0700


On Apr 4, 2015, at 7:28 PM, Charles Gucker <cgucker () onesc net> wrote:

I've been involved in IX renumbering efforts because exchange(s)
decided to use /25's instead of /24's.    It's painful because
troubleshooting can be a little difficult as differing subnetmasks are
in play.   If you have the address space, use a /24.    ARIN has IPv4
address space specifically reserved for the use by IXPs.

Yes.  Listen to Charlie.

We did a bunch of analysis on size of IXP subnets, and how it changes over time, relative to the age of the IXP.  To 
summarize drastically, the first /24 typically lasts about 15-18 years.  Only a tiny handful of exchanges (less than 
2%) are actually supporting more than 254 participants yet at this point.  That number will continue to grow over time. 
 At the same time, it’s not worth the trouble of renumbering more than once in that time period, so don’t be penny-wise 
and pound-foolish by trying to use a /25, particularly when ARIN hands out /24s to IXPs specifically to keep them from 
running into that trap.

                                -Bill




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Current thread: