nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:18:56 -0700
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy () gmail com> wrote:
I find this rather offensive as you clearly have no idea what I have contributed to the OSS community or more specifically to the VyOS project. Among working, studying a masters degree and a little sleep to keep me sane, I already do what I can.
My sincere apologies. At the time, that kickstarter was failing, and I was mindblown that nobody had seen the potential of it, and I had spent 3 days, trying to convince more people to throw in, as I had already thrown in all I could. My comment was directed far more at the universe than yourself and was more in the context of my prior bufferbloat-related rant earlier in the day, which I have spent 4 years on, mostly full time, and mostly unpaid. I am still sad that nobody threw in for that get one give one program (who pays for the software engineers?), and that it took events like heartbleed to get the LF´s core infrastructure inititative funded, and, well, frankly, it is a long, long list of things that bug me that have accumulated... that I will try to keep off this list.
TimOn 9 Apr 2015, at 10:42 am, Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com> wrote:On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Tim Raphael <raphael.timothy () gmail com> wrote: Correct. But hopefully not far off now that there are x86 packages for simple MPLS operations. With a bit of luck an RSVP or LDP implementation isn't far behind.
So to return this to a more rational basis - why does an edge network need MPLS in the first place? -- Dave Täht Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware** https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/N8mZ5F5iSPU
Current thread:
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE, (continued)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Mark Tinka (Apr 12)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Dave Bell (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Faisal Imtiaz (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Watson, Bob (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Mark Tinka (Apr 12)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Tim Raphael (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Josh Reynolds (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Tim Raphael (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Dave Taht (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Tim Raphael (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Dave Taht (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Tim Raphael (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Dave Taht (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Watson, Bob (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Daniel Rohan (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Daniel Rohan (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Tim Raphael (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Josh Baird (Apr 09)
- RE: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE timrutherford (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE Watson, Bob (Apr 08)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE [TOPIC DRIFT!] Barry Shein (Apr 09)
- Re: Multi-gigabit edge devices as CPE [TOPIC DRIFT!] Baldur Norddahl (Apr 09)