nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering and Network Cost
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:10:25 +0200
On 15/Apr/15 22:12, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Please keep in mind that some companies peer despite it offers no savings for them and at the end of the day it might be even more expensive. They do it because of performance and reliability reasons.
And also to reduce AS hops. If you and your competition are pushing BGP routes to your multi-homed customers, the customers are "more likely" to choose paths with fewer AS hops. Traffic to you means $$ to you. In the long run, it "could" pay off, or at the very least, get you more customers. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Peering and Network Cost, (continued)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- RE: Peering and Network Cost Siegel, David (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Baldur Norddahl (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost William Waites (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Jason Lixfeld (Apr 19)