nanog mailing list archives
Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:37:11 -0400
An additional advantage for Frontier customers, post acquisition: http://ipadmin.frontier.com/bilateralpeering_policy.pdf http://www.verizonenterprise.com/terms/peering/ $0.02, -a On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Matthew Black <Matthew.Black () csulb edu> wrote:I ran a few Google searches and came across a trove of complaintsagainst Frontier. Seems they are far worse than GTE/Verizon. On the few occasions I have called for FIOS support, always reached someone knowledgeable and helpful. Not looking forward to the changeover, as the new owners have to pay off debts from their acquisition. That can only be accomplished through rate increases. I see a Verizon tech outside my kitchen window every two to three days as he replaces two nitrogen tanks keeping copper trunks pressurized against water intrusion.though, on the positive side... maybe you'll see ipv6 on frontier fios before the heat death of the universe? (*which is when vz fios folk will see it, apparently).
Current thread:
- RE: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Matthew Black (Aug 03)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Christopher Morrow (Aug 03)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Adam Rothschild (Aug 03)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Mike Hammett (Aug 03)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Adam Rothschild (Aug 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Andrew Carey (Aug 04)
- RE: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Matthew Black (Aug 04)
- Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California Christopher Morrow (Aug 03)