nanog mailing list archives
Re: Production-scale NAT64
From: Tore Anderson <tore () fud no>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:53:46 +0200
Hi Mark, * Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
In our deployment, we do not offer customers private IPv4 addresses. I suppose we can afford to do this because a) we still have lots of public IPv4, b) we are not a mobile carrier. So any of our customers with IPv4 will never hit the NAT64 gateway. When we do run out of public IPv4 addresses (and cannot get anymore from AFRINIC), all new customers will be assigned IPv6 addresses.
Why wait until then? Any particular reason why you cannot already today provide IPv6 addresses to your [new] customers in parallel with IPv4? Tore
Current thread:
- Re: Production-scale NAT64, (continued)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 25)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tom Lanyon (Aug 25)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Izaac (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Brandon Ross (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)