nanog mailing list archives
Re: Production-scale NAT64
From: Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:57:25 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Mark Tinka wrote:
If your IPv4 is public, you should not "feel slow". Of course, if your IPv4 is private, then yes, some NAT44 may happen somewhere along the path.
I strongly advise you to not assume that just because an IPv4 address is "public" (which I'm reading as RFC1918) means that it's not NATed.
I learned the hard way that Tmobile, for one, squats on other organization's public IP space on their mobile network and NATs it to address space they are actually assigned. What you really mean is if your IPv4 is not NATed, then it should not "feel slow", the type of address isn't necessarily an indicator.
-- Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442 Skype: brandonross Schedule a meeting: http://www.doodle.com/bross
Current thread:
- Re: Production-scale NAT64, (continued)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Jared Mauch (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Andrews (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Tore Anderson (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Brandon Ross (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Randy Bush (Aug 29)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Bjoern A. Zeeb (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Ca By (Aug 27)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: Production-scale NAT64 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)