nanog mailing list archives

Re: de-peering for security sake

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:47:46 -0500

On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:11:13 -0800, Owen DeLong said:

Or contexts where the user is sloppy about securing their private key, e.g. the real world.


I seem to remember that enough people stashed their entire home directory
to github, including their keys, that github had to put in special hacks
to stop that.

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- - - Message not available
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 25)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Stephen Satchell (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Joe Abley (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake William Waites (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Matthew Petach (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Baldur Norddahl (Dec 26)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Dec 27)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 27)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Christopher Morrow (Dec 27)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hale (Dec 27)
    - Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Dec 27)

(Thread continues...)