nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 deagg
From: Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:48:48 +0100
Hi Mans,
I'm working at one of those organisations who have a /48 and am announcing it into DFZ. We have a situation where I might have another site with separate connectivity to the DFZ (but there is internal networking) which would entitle me to another /48 according to RIR rules.
Correct.
I did ask my LIR whether there is any thought given to the possibility of getting the next higher prefix, thus creating a /47. They did understand the "why" perfectly well, of course. However, apparently there is no such process or intention available from the RIR in question (RIPE), short of explicitly asking for that specific prefix.
So you asked to grow the /48 to a /47? Was it accepted? Or did you want the RIR to automatically grow your first assignment when you request a second one without you having to ask?
Of course this does not help every case, but supporting aggregation where possible certainly ought to be in-scope for most policy-making bodies in this area.
Then please take this to the appropriate policy-making body: address-policy-wg () ripe net :-) Cheers! Sander
Current thread:
- Re: v6 deagg, (continued)
- Re: v6 deagg Jima (Feb 19)
- Re: v6 deagg Brent Jones (Feb 19)
- Re: v6 deagg Christopher Morrow (Feb 19)
- Re: v6 deagg Owen DeLong (Feb 24)
- Re: v6 deagg Christopher Morrow (Feb 24)
- Re: v6 deagg Jima (Feb 19)
- Re: v6 deagg Saku Ytti (Feb 20)
- Re: v6 deagg Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 20)
- Re: v6 deagg Nikolay Shopik (Feb 20)
- Re: v6 deagg Jack Bates (Feb 20)
- Re: v6 deagg Måns Nilsson (Feb 21)
- Re: v6 deagg Sander Steffann (Feb 21)
- Re: v6 deagg Måns Nilsson (Feb 21)
- Re: v6 deagg Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 20)
- Re: v6 deagg Randy Bush (Feb 23)
- Re: v6 deagg William Herrin (Feb 23)
- Re: v6 deagg Sander Steffann (Feb 24)
- Re: v6 deagg William Herrin (Feb 24)
- Re: v6 deagg Jack Bates (Feb 26)