nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route leak in Bangladesh
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 15:54:16 +0100
On 01/07/2015 15:51, Mark Tinka wrote:
I found RPSL complicated a few years ago, and sort of put that on the back-burner.
you probably want to ignore more rpsl constructs and depend solely on as-sets, aut-nums and route/route6 objects. RPSL is not going to live up to your expectations. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Jared Mauch (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Nick Hilliard (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Nick Hilliard (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mike Hammett (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Hugo Slabbert (Jul 02)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jul 02)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Jared Mauch (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Jared Mauch (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Joe Abley (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Nick Hilliard (Jul 01)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Nick Hilliard (Jul 01)