nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:24:29 -0400
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <CANjVB-jbtc4V5yba0xtGA7N5geQcz86hvydj4J9J8UxhzMMEZw () mail gmail com>
We don't use Class E because were using up IPv4 space too quickly to make it worthwhile to make it work cleanly for everyone.
That is a self fulfilling prophecy.I suspect a 16 /8 right about now would be very welcome for everybody other then the ipv6 adherents.
Seems like procrastination is only bad when its your baby.The jury is still out on class E, but the verdict is in for the community who created it.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Barry Shein (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Barry Shein (Jul 16)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion George Metz (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Tony Hain (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion joel jaeggli (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion joel jaeggli (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Jared Mauch (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Tony Hain (Jul 15)