nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:53:38 -0400
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:34:13 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
That covers multicast and RFC-1918. Are there any other IPv4 segmentations that you can think of?
...
Given that we came up with 3 total segmentations in IPv4 over the course
#1-3,#4 RFC-1918 is 3 "segments" and we recently added a 4th (for CGN). #5 Localhost (127/8) #6 Multicast (224/4) #7 "Class E" (240/4) #8 0/8#9 255/8 (technically, part of class e, but it's called out specifically in various RFCs)
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 16)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Kaufman (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 14)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Tony Hain (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Lyndon Nerenberg (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Doug Barton (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion George Metz (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Barry Shein (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Barry Shein (Jul 16)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion George Metz (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Doug Barton (Jul 15)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Tony Hain (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 14)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion joel jaeggli (Jul 15)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Joe Maimon (Jul 15)