nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 15 Jun 2015 19:17:22 -0000
but 'well behaved smtp clients' should already be falling back right?
If you have multiple SMTP servers at the same priority, it's a pretty broken client that doesn't try them all until one works. That said, there is a depressing number of pretty broken SMTP clients. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Randy Bush (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Matt Palmer (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Orthoefer (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Levine (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mark Andrews (Jun 16)