nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:55:51 -0700
If you read what Joe wrote, he doesn't currently have an AS number or employ BGP with his Internet providers. Extrapolate for his IPv4 assignment situation and the /24 announcement barrier. In an IPv4-depleted world, he won't be doing anycast any time soon…
…which is one of the reasons why I suggested that he do anycast DNS (presumably using a DNS service provider) rather than anycast SMTP (presumably using himself) anyway. So, regardless of how much you’re rolling your eyes, we’re saying the same thing. We’re just being testy about the details. -Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Dave Taht (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Matt Palmer (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Orthoefer (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? John Levine (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Mark Andrews (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? James Hartig (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 19)