Re: Low Cost 10G Router

[Blake Dunlap <ikiris () gmail com>]

good, cheap, built by someone else....


pick 2

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com> wrote:
> So, from the sounds of it most are saying for low cost, the way to go would
> be a software router, which I was trying to avoid. To answer the bandwidth
> question, we would have three 10G ports with three different carriers and
> at max push 10Gbps of total traffic to start.
>
> I think this leaves me with hardware routers that can support full BGP
> tables. So, who actually sells full bgp routers. So far on my list I have:
> Juniper MX Series
> Brocade MLXe or CER
> Cisco ASR 9K
> Huawei NE40E-X1-M4
> ZTE, not sure which model?
> ALU 7750
>
> Besides the above, am I missing anyone else that makes a true carrier grade
> hardware router?
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov () gmail com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > Yes, we could run route add / route del when we got any announce from
> > external world with ExaBGP directly. I have implemented custom custom
> > Firewall (netmap-ipfw) management tool which implement in similar
> > manner. But I'm working with BGP flow spec. It's so complex, standard
> > BGP is much times simpler.
> >
> > And I could share my ExaBGP configuration and hook scripts.
> >
> > ExaBGP config:
> > https://github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon/blob/master/src/scripts/exabgp_firewall.conf
> >
> > Hook script which put all announces to Redis Queue:
> >
> > https://github.com/FastVPSEestiOu/fastnetmon/blob/master/src/scripts/exabgp_queue_writer.py
> >
> > But full BGP route table is enough big and need external processing.
> >
> > But yes, with some Python code is possible to implement route server
> > with ExaBGP.
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Aled Morris <aledm () qix co uk> wrote:
> > > On 20 May 2015 at 15:00, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Yes, you could do filtering with Quagga. But Quagga is pretty old tool
> > > > without multiple dynamic features. But with ExaBGP you could do really
> > > > any significant route table transformations with Python in few lines
> > > > of code. But it's definitely add additional point of failure/bug.
> > >
> > >
> > > Couldn't your back-end scripts running under ExaBGP also manage the FIB,
> > > using standard Unix tools/APIs?
> > >
> > > Managing the FIB is basically just "route add" and "route delete" right?
> > >
> > > Aled
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov