nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fw: new message
From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:06:13 +0100
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 01:54:01PM +0000, Gavin Henry wrote:
Anything to be done about all these?
Yes, it appears that even though the sender was blocked 30 hours ago or so in mailman itself, there was still tons of pre-existing garbage in the mailqueus which was flushed out over the last 30 hours. Clearly we failed in purging that garbage from the queue in a timely manner. Going forward, I expect some protection mechanisms will be implemented, rather sooner then later, to prevent this style of incident from happening again. Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Fw: new message, (continued)
- Fw: new message Sean Donelan (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Richard Graves RHT (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Joe Freeman (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Truman Boyes (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Tomas Podermanski (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Mark Kosters (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Joe Abley (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Fw: new message Jorge Amodio (Oct 26)
- Re: Fw: new message Gavin Henry (Oct 26)
- Re: Fw: new message Job Snijders (Oct 26)
- improved NANOG filtering Rob McEwen (Oct 26)
- Re: improved NANOG filtering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 26)
- Re: improved NANOG filtering Rob McEwen (Oct 26)
- Re: improved NANOG filtering Barry Shein (Oct 26)
- Re: improved NANOG filtering shawn wilson (Oct 27)
- Re: Fw: new message Job Snijders (Oct 26)
- Re: improved NANOG filtering Blake Dunlap (Oct 26)
- Re: Fw: new message Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)
- Re: Fw: new message Jon Lewis (Oct 26)
- Re: Fw: new message Niels Bakker (Oct 26)