nanog mailing list archives
Re: more FUSSPs, Uptick in spam
From: Ian Smith <ian.w.smith () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:13:57 -0400
I was assuming that messages to the list were already filtered by sender, so non-list or randomized senders would have been rejected by mailman. -Ian
Current thread:
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam, (continued)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Jutta Zalud (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Colin Johnston (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam anthony kasza (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Peter Beckman (Oct 27)
- Re: more FUSSPs, Uptick in spam John Levine (Oct 27)
- Re: more FUSSPs, Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Connor Wilkins (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Octavio Alvarez (Oct 28)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Octavio Alvarez (Oct 28)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Jim Popovitch (Oct 28)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 26)
- RE: Uptick in spam Steve Mikulasik (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam Andrew Kirch (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam Larry Sheldon (Oct 26)