nanog mailing list archives
RE: IP-Echelon Compliance
From: Matthew Black <Matthew.Black () csulb edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:12:59 +0000
As a recipient of their stuff, it would be nice if IP Echelon even followed the information registered with the US Copyright Office for such notices. We paid $80 to let everyone know where notices should be sent. matthew black First Amendment: speaking for myself and not my employer! -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Seth Arnold Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 3:05 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Hi All, Please feel free to get in touch with us to request changes. Expedited processing of your requests is offered through the Notice Recipient Management for ISPs section of our website located here: http://www.ip-echelon.com/isp-notice-management/ <http://www.ip-echelon.com/isp-notice-management/> If you are in the U.S., please also ensure that your change is reflected in the records of the US Copyright Office: http://copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html <http://copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html> Cheers, Seth
Current thread:
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance, (continued)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthias Leisi (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance George Herbert (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Mike Hammett (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 15)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Andrew Kirch (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 13)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Tony Wicks (Oct 13)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 13)