nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:21:10 -0500 (CDT)
Some people here just strive to be dicks... ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Herbert" <george.herbert () gmail com> To: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org>, "Rich Kulawiec" <rsk () gsp org> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 1:19:00 PM Subject: Re: IP-Echelon Compliance You guys aren't devious enough. These guys are in violation of CAN-SPAM. To the tune of exceeding the statutory maximum $1,000,000 per ISP last *month* for some of you, much less in the statute of limitations period. You could probably point to refusal to remove as justifying the triple damages claim. Everyone on this list just earned your companies $3 million. Call your attorneys. George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:20 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
http://www.procmail.org/I wouldn't necessarily recommend that approach. There is no obligation for victims of spammers to continue providing Internet services to them, including SMTP services.computers are cheap. my time is finite and i value it highly. what is the minimal action i can take to see that idiots do not take my time? randy
Current thread:
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance, (continued)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Peter Kristolaitis (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Jason Hellenthal (Oct 13)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Stephen Satchell (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Matthias Leisi (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance George Herbert (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Mike Hammett (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Rich Kulawiec (Oct 15)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Andrew Kirch (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 14)
- Re: IP-Echelon Compliance Eric Kuhnke (Oct 13)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Tony Wicks (Oct 13)
- RE: IP-Echelon Compliance Christopher Morrow (Oct 13)