nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 21:40:26 -0500
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:53:40 -0500, Rich Kulawiec said:
I've said this many times: abuse does not magically fall out of the sky. It comes from hosts, on networks, run by people. It is time -- well past time -- to hold those people *personally* acountable.
And who, *exactly*, are you planning to hold *personally* accountable? The Joe Sixpack who didn't patch his system? The guy who's doing as much as he can with the resources he's given? The guy above him who didn't hire 3 more people because his group isn't given the budget for it? The CFO who didn't give budget for 3 more people because 3 qualified people plus benefits would wipe out the small ISP's profits and then somee?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Doug Barton (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 18)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Michael O'Connor (Jan 19)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 19)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Jan 20)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Jan 16)