nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 12:49:50 +0900
Jared Mauch wrote:
https://youtu.be/v26BAlfWBm8 Is always good for a reminder and laughs on a holiday weekend.
But, end to end NATs are actually good: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohta-e2e-nat-00 fully transparent to all the transport and application layer protocols. And, to applications running over TCP/UDP, UPnP capable legacy NATs are transparent, if host TCP/UDP are modified to perform reverse NAT, information to do so is provided by UPnP. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- IPv6 deployment excuses Mike Jones (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Marcin Cieslak (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Hugo Slabbert (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Filip Hruska (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Masataka Ohta (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 04)
- IPv6 deployment excuses Ca By (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ca By (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Baldur Norddahl (Jul 05)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 01)