Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

[Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>]

Actually they are not that great. Look at the DDoS mess that UPnP has created and problems for IoT (I call it Internet 
of trash, as most devices are poorly implemented without safety in mind) folks on all sides. 

The fact that I go to a hotel and that AT&T mobility have limited internet reach is a technology problem that we all 
must work to fix. 

Jared Mauch

> On Jul 1, 2016, at 11:49 PM, Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
>
> And, to applications running over TCP/UDP, UPnP capable legacy
> NATs are transparent, if host TCP/UDP are modified to perform
> reverse NAT, information to do so is provided by UPnP.