nanog mailing list archives

Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention


From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:35:53 +0200



On 6/Jun/16 17:54, Job Snijders wrote:

There is the "human network" approach, where operators share information
with each other which be used to generate config to help block
"unlikely" announcements from eBGP neighbors.

For instance AT&T and NTT agreed (through email) that there should be no
intermediate networks between 2914 & 7018, therefore NTT blocks
announcements that match as-path-regexp '_7018_' on any and all eBGP
sessions, except the direct sessions with 7018. NTT calls this concept
"peerlocking".

I suppose if one is performing prefix- and ASN-based filtering, then you
"should" not learn peer paths via customers. If you augment that with
AS_PATH-based filtering, you "will not" learn peer paths via customers.

One thing we do to reduce opportunistically hazardous vectors is to not
learn customer paths via peers.

Mark.


Current thread: