nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 21:39:54 -0700
.-----------------. | | | B |--------- D S ---------| A R | | C |--------- (toward S) | | `-----------------' of course, simpletons such as i would desire the source of the time exceeded message to be A. after all, this is the interface to which i sent the icmp with the TTL to expire.Do you mean the source address or the source interface?
the source address
I'm not sure if you mean that, if sent through C it should have the source addres of A, or that it should actually be sent through A regardless of the routing table (which sounds better to me).
not to me. i have kinda grown used to fibs randy
Current thread:
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Marc Storck (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute William Herrin (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Marc Storck (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Octavio Alvarez (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Hugo Slabbert (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute William Herrin (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Octavio Alvarez (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Randy Bush (Jun 01)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Randy Bush (Jun 05)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Josh Reynolds (Jun 05)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Randy Bush (Jun 05)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute Josh Reynolds (Jun 05)
- Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute William Herrin (Jun 01)