nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:29:52 +0200
On 10/Mar/16 00:22, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
I must be missing something very obvious here, because i cannot think of any reason why an IXP shouldn't enable the maximum possible MTU on its infrastructure to be available to its customers. Then it's clearly customers' decision on what MTU to use on their devices, as long as: * It fits inside IXP's MTU * It suits with any other customer's (exchanging traffic with) MTU
This is a valid point. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?, (continued)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Nikolay Shopik (Mar 17)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Baldur Norddahl (Mar 17)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Martin Pels (Mar 12)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Saku Ytti (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Nick Hilliard (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Dale W. Carder (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tim McKee (Mar 20)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tim McKee (Mar 20)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Chuck Church (Mar 21)