nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?
From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder () wisc edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:02:48 -0500
Thus spake Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (jheitz () cisco com) on Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:29:44PM +0000:
What's driving the desire for larger packets?
In our little corner of the internet, it is to increase the performance of a low number of high-bdp flows which are typically dataset transfers. All of our non-commercial peers support 9k. Dale
Current thread:
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?, (continued)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Martin Pels (Mar 12)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Saku Ytti (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Nick Hilliard (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 10)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Dale W. Carder (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tim McKee (Mar 20)
- Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Jakob Heitz (jheitz) (Mar 18)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Tim McKee (Mar 20)
- RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames? Chuck Church (Mar 21)