nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 16:24:12 +0200
On 1/Mar/16 09:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with switching backbone on Nexus switches.
As opposed to? We are looking at the Nexus 7700 for 100Gbps core switching. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX, (continued)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Josh Reynolds (Mar 01)