nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:33:55 +0300
As opposed to older Cisco switches. Btw, 100GE is pretty new and actually I have experience only with Extreme Black Diamond 8. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On 1/Mar/16 09:44, Pavel Odintsov wrote:But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with switching backbone on Nexus switches.As opposed to? We are looking at the Nexus 7700 for 100Gbps core switching. Mark.
-- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX, (continued)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Josh Reynolds (Mar 01)