nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:21:05 -0700
On Mar 11, 2016, at 11:50 , Damien Burke <damien () supremebytes com> wrote: Just received an updated statement from cogent support: "We appreciate your concerns. This is a known issue that originates with Google as it is up to their discretion as to how they announce routes to us v4 or v6. Once again, apologies for any inconvenience." And: "The SLA does not cover route transit beyond our network. We cannot route to IPs that are not announced to us by the IP owner, directly or through a network peer."
Which is a cute way of leaving out “However, since we refuse to accept them directly peering with us…” Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun, (continued)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Dennis Bohn (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Mark Tinka (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Baldur Norddahl (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: Cogent - Google - HE Fun Owen DeLong (Mar 13)