nanog mailing list archives
Re: CALEA
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 07:49:07 -0700
In a message written on Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:00:59PM -0500, Josh Reynolds wrote:
This is a large list that includes many Tier 1 network operators, government agencies, and Fortune 500 network operators. The silence should be telling.
NANOG has a strong self-selection for people who run core routing devices and do things like BGP and peering negotiations with other providers. By contrast, CALEA requirements are generally all met by features deployed at the customer-edge. These groups are often a separate silo from the backbone folks at the largest providers. This is likely the wrong list for asking such questions, and the few who do answer is likely to be smaller providers where people wear multiple hats. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: CALEA, (continued)
- Re: CALEA Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: CALEA Josh Reynolds (May 10)
- Re: CALEA Brian Mengel (May 11)
- Re: CALEA Ricky Beam (May 11)
- Re: CALEA Brian Mengel (May 12)
- Re: CALEA Mike Joseph (May 29)
- Re: CALEA Josh Luthman (May 29)
- Re: CALEA Martin Hannigan (May 31)
- Re: CALEA Martin Hannigan (May 31)
- Re: CALEA Christopher Morrow (May 31)
- Re: CALEA Leo Bicknell (May 11)