nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers
From: Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 01:08:20 +0200
Blake,
On 04 May 2016, at 00:23, Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net> wrote: Łukasz Bromirski wrote on 5/3/2016 4:13 PM:On 03 May 2016, at 22:31, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulander () telecomputing se> wrote:Yes I can confirm that we also had the issue with the asr1001s.
[...]
I feel like you're trying to fit some other (possible, but far fetched) scenario from where we started.
Yeah, sorry for that - saw 1001 in quote and kept that as original platform. For 1002 with SSO off you may be fine, sure. BTW, the versions you're quoting as working were also quoted by me as the ones that could have been OK even on the 1001 (I know, I know). -- Łukasz Bromirski CCIE R&S/SP #15929, CCDE #2012::17, PGP Key ID: 0xFD077F6A
Current thread:
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers, (continued)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Nick Hilliard (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Łukasz Bromirski (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Nick Hilliard (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Chuck Church (May 04)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 04)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Carlos Alcantar (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Łukasz Bromirski (May 03)
- SV: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Gustav Ulander (May 03)