nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers


From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 20:57:07 -0500

I turned up a full ip4 feed on an RP1 today. Took approximately 5 minutes to fill the rib and probably another 5 
minutes to push to the fib. The CLI responsiveness was noticeably slowed during this process, but the router didn't 
drop traffic. I'm guessing a second feed would involve fewer rib and fib changes and would converge faster. 

On May 3, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Carlos Alcantar <carlos () race com> wrote:

I know this thread has been primarily about memory to hold the routing tables, but how well does it do with the BGP 
convergence time??  which could be the other killer with multiple full route tables.



Current thread: