nanog mailing list archives
Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT
From: James Downs <egon () egon cc>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:44:07 -0800
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:53:41AM -0800, Kasper Adel wrote:
Would this be an acceptable offering in today's IT from different type of Enterprises (Minux the Googles, Facebooks...etc) ?
The comments from others on this thread have some good points to make, but in my experience, even at places that outsource to SaaS, a black box on the internal network isn't going to fly. Cheers, -j
Current thread:
- Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Kasper Adel (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Denis Fondras (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Alexander Harrowell (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Denis Fondras (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Jared Mauch (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Leo Bicknell (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Rich Kulawiec (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Brett Frankenberger (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT James Downs (Nov 28)