nanog mailing list archives
Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT
From: Denis Fondras <xxnog () ledeuns net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 09:36:14 +0100
On 28/Nov/16 19:53, Kasper Adel wrote: Hi, Vendor X wants you to run their VNF (Router, Firewall or Whatever) and they refuse to give you root access, or any means necessary to do 'maintenance' kind of work, whether its applying security updates, or any other similar type of task that is needed for you to integrate the Linux VM into your IT eco-system. Would this be an acceptable offering in today's IT from different type of Enterprises (Minux the Googles, Facebooks...etc) ?
As long as the vendor will be held liable for ANY (and I mean it) problem that could happen on my infrastructure.
Current thread:
- Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Kasper Adel (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Denis Fondras (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Alexander Harrowell (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Denis Fondras (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Jared Mauch (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Mark Tinka (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Leo Bicknell (Nov 29)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Rich Kulawiec (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT Brett Frankenberger (Nov 28)
- Re: Accepting a Virtualized Functions (VNFs) into Corporate IT James Downs (Nov 28)