nanog mailing list archives
Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:47:57 -0700
In a message written on Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:03:11AM -0700, Stephen Satchell wrote:
For the last couple of weeks, every single abuse mail I've tried to send to networks in a very short list of countries has bounced back with "mailbox exceeds quota". I take this to mean that there isn't someone actively reading, acting on, and deleting e-mail from abuse@<whomever>.
Are there any ISP's left that read and respond to abuse@ in a timely fashion? I haven't seen one in at least a decade. Maybe I e-mail the wrong ones. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Christopher Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Christopher Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Jimmy Hess (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? J (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Christopher Morrow (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Leo Bicknell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Steve Atkins (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? bzs (Oct 27)
- Re: Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? J (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Steve Atkins (Oct 27)