nanog mailing list archives
Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 25 Oct 2016 04:50:20 -0000
Are there any ISP's left that read and respond to abuse@ in a timely fashion? I haven't seen one in at least a decade. Maybe I e-mail the wrong ones.
Or maybe you send reports that they can't act on. Mine are all in ARF format and ISPs reply and tell me they've acted on them all the time. In many cases they reports go into ticketing systems, so they'll get acted on but you don't get an answer from a person. That's fine with me, I'd rather they spend time swatting bad guys than composing mail by hand. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?, (continued)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Jimmy Hess (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? J (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Leo Bicknell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Steve Atkins (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Dan Hollis (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? bzs (Oct 27)
- Re: Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? J (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Stephen Satchell (Oct 27)
- Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas? Steve Atkins (Oct 27)